Interesteing valve spring info

TheHood

Member
There seems to be some good info on this forum thread here http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.php?f ... 415437&p=1

Doesn't look good for most of the available valve spring options.....

Although the argument is probably only relevant if it really isn't a good idea to be machining the head to make them fit.

One guy also casts some doubt on the merits of fitting CompCams with standard springs dunno..
 

vocky

Staff
I did read that thread and it certainly made me open my eyes !

I agree with what they are saying, the double valve springs are really the wrong size for the ecotec 2.2 / z22se, so the head has to be machined or they will coil bind.

my saab head will be getting machined in a few weeks or so
 

alanoo

Senior Member
The needed machining is far from being difficult


EDIT : Ok, read this Jbody topic and all is true there.
Same could be said for the Schrick stuff, I heard many tuners are not following the installed height specs and not doing the full machining when they fit it.
Schrick springs needs two things being done :
- Increase the head diameter where the spring seat is (otherwise the clearance is two close between the coils and the head)
- Get the expected installed height by removing a few 1/10th of mm on each of the lower retainers which is the part many get bad...
 

vocky

Staff
the valve spring seat needs to be cut 1.5mm deeper into the head !

I will have them cut 1mm as I'm not going crazy on valve lift, well only 11.58mm :)
 

TheHood

Member
So do you think "protomec" comment on page 3 about there not an awful lot of material to be machining away has any validity?
 

vocky

Staff
I will trial fit the new valve springs, measure the installed height and then check for coil bind at the cams maximum lift.

then I will decide what needs doing, but I won't be machining any more than is needed, hopefully zero - as thats cheapest :LOL:
 
Top