on the day, I would have to agree that all the results seemed quite low. Now that I've had time to think and compare the results, I am quite sure that they are very accurate. If you have a look on thorney motorsport's website (http://www.thorneymotorsport.co.uk/tuni ... ower.shtml), where it lists all their stages of tunes/remaps and gives dyno dynamics graphs. Compare their graph of the standard car to one of our standard cars from saturday - very similar, never really get above 140. As for their later stages of tune.. we can only really compare up to stage 2+, as they miss out a graph for stage 3 (same as stage 2 but with cams) but it's meant to have a max of 0-5bhp more than stage 2+, so I guess we can say that the stage 3 could deliver 160-163bhp:
ECU remap, Milltek exhaust, ITG Induction kit, Schrick racing cams, gas flowed head (pretty much the same setup as ed's car) (mine doesn't have ported head, but dbilas exhaust manifold instead), and we both have the 2.4 manifold extra. Imagine this graph goes up to 163..
Now bare in mind that none of us had had a remap (the tms graphs have ofcourse), then the readings from saturday are starting to look quite respectable
Like the guy said on the day.. a correctly set up syno dynamics rr isn't going to put a smile on anybody's face 🙂 I'm very willing to trust it for now, and hopefully when I go to my local dyno dynamics in a couple weeks it will be similar to this one
