Simon Ward said:
What was wrong before Matt? I thought it was running quite sweet?
I found with the DigitalOcean droplets, they were quite slow when it came to CPU intensive stuff, such as installing add-ons on the forum (you have to rebuild all the templates). It's my own fault for being spoilt with 14 cores from the last VPS, and the ability to burst when the node itself is quiet.
The new set up allows the same, with 2x CPU priority on 8 cores. There is also a lot more disc space on the new one, as the DO one only had 40GB, and we've got over 20GB of attachments on the site.
It's also faster network wise, we are back in London, and it's only 9 hops to the VPS, with better ping response times
[mworthington@artemis ~]$ ping z22se.co.uk (Linode)
PING z22se.co.uk (212.71.237.228) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from li666-228.members.linode.com (212.71.237.228): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=9.94 ms
64 bytes from li666-228.members.linode.com (212.71.237.228): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=9.87 ms
64 bytes from li666-228.members.linode.com (212.71.237.228): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=9.85 ms
--- z22se.co.uk ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.854/9.891/9.941/0.036 ms
[mworthington@artemis ~]$ ping vps.z22se.org.uk (DO)
PING vps.z22se.org.uk (146.185.156.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from vps.z22se.org.uk (146.185.156.8): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=21.6 ms
64 bytes from vps.z22se.org.uk (146.185.156.8): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=21.5 ms
64 bytes from vps.z22se.org.uk (146.185.156.8): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=21.5 ms