ATOM_X Sorry not meaning to be cynical But i have read so many posts now I am not concerned about physical fitted Is anybody completely satisfied with the 2.4 Inlet manifold + 2.4 TB from an operational perspective? I am not to old to be taught
rushy Both myself and Vid tried a 2.4Tb on a stock manifold and on a 2.4 manifold and they both failed, I know thats nothing new but in the Vec we run a MAF not the traditional setup the SE uses. It also doesn't work on a YH Vec. I could start, tick over, slowly drive down the road, but as soon as I put it under any sort of load the car went into limp mode.
blue_se2 as above fitted mine was fine on the spot reved like a motorbike! but as soon as it saw a load on came the EML and limp home was engaged and the car simply idled and ran at 3000 rpm
ATOM_X alanoo said: I do, but with a standalone ECU 😃 thanks yes I know its possible but Working with the standard ECU seems to be a nightmare is that a fair statement
JohnnyN My car was the test bed for this project and it failed! The car was with Courtenay for 5 months and included input from overseas partners of Courtenay, Klassen Motors.
ATOM_X JohnnyN said: My car was the test bed for this project and it failed! The car was with Courtenay for 5 months and included input from overseas partners of Courtenay, Klassen Motors. Not looking good, I have spoken to Jon (courtenay's) This TB is the perfect size it is a pity nobody has cracked it I think it is worth a dabble for the RR
blue_se2 i was going to remove the internals from the 2.2 TB and fit them into the 2.4 TB could this work??
alanoo ATOM X said: alanoo said: I do, but with a standalone ECU 😃 thanks yes I know its possible but Working with the standard ECU seems to be a nightmare is that a fair statement The PID of the 2.4 TB drive is totally different to the one of the z22se one and LSJ I cannot switch the 2.4 to a z22se or LSJ without heavy target position overruns and I'm almost sure the stock ECU can't live with that as a safety feature